6 min read

Detecting AI-Generated Images

Watermarks, metadata, visual artifacts, and why no single signal is conclusive on its own.

The signals you can stack

Filename hints (mj_, sdxl_, dalle_), embedded C2PA manifests, unusual dimensions (1024×1024, 1536×1536), and known vendor strings in the file bytes all push the needle. None of them alone is proof.

Visual cues that still help

Garbled text, extra fingers, asymmetric jewelry, and impossible reflections remain common giveaways in 2026, though top-tier models clean these up most of the time.

Why model-based detectors are unreliable alone

Classifier models that judge 'AI vs real' are easily fooled by light editing, compression, and out-of-distribution photos. Use them as one signal among many, never as the final word.

A pragmatic workflow

Check AI Watermark gives you the metadata layer in seconds. For high-stakes decisions, combine it with a reverse image search, a model-based detector, and a careful human look at the image itself.

Try the tool

Check AI Watermark

Upload an image to scan for AI watermarks, provenance signatures, and metadata clues.

Open Check AI Watermark

Frequently asked questions

No. Even with a confirmed watermark, the image could have been a human photo that an AI pipeline merely processed. Treat results as probabilistic.
Back to Check AI Watermark